|
february !made me shiver |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hot button
i try not to curse for emphasis
|
|
000218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Police save goldfish from blender-art exhibit
The creation by artist Marco Evaristti consisted of goldfish swimming inside
regular kitchen-blenders. Exhibition visitors could switch on a blender, transforming
the content to fish soup...
|
|
|
|
|
At 02:01 PM 2/17/00 -0800, mark gadzikowski wrote
>> beauty may be in the eye, but these arent artists,
>> theyre just sick fucks.
At 06:41 PM 2/17/00 -0800, PAA wrote:
> Something tells me youre not a libertarian...
|
|
|
|
|
ok, i thought i was mostly libertarian, but maybe im confused. i saw this as a
moral issue, not a social one.
opposing cruelty to animals is not the same as asking for government intervention.
did you take me to mean i was in favor of police intervention?
the police intervention was not the part i intended to highlight.
when i called the artist and fish killers sick fucks, i wasnt defending police
intervention. rather i was expressing vulgar contempt for the perpetrators of
animal torture for human entertainment.
in my philosophy: morality and social freedoms are separate issues. morality should
never be a matter of legislation; however, antisocial behaviors must be subject to
social codes (legislation) in any cooperative society. yes, we can now get into a
discussion of definitions, fellow English major.
on the goldfish issue, the torture and murder of animals is a moral choice, and earns
my contempt. the murder of humans is an antisocial behavior, and earns my vote for
legislation. human society should be protected against antisocial behavior by a social
code (AKA government law enforcement and accompanying judicial system).
consider the petition you asked me to sign regarding legalizing gay marriages. i
cant sign a petition for a law supporting only gay marriages without thought,
because adding a new law is rarely the proper response to fixing an improper law.
i agree with your motivations, but im having to contemplate your methods.
we should repeal and redraft the current laws, rather than add a buble-gum patch to
a rube-goldberg legal system, a patch that allows for a specific exception that
benefits only a limited group. im still considering your petition, because
a creaky wheel can be better than having no wheel until a good one is found;
however, im still against perpetuating a bad law through exception-making.
because i hold a strong anti-legislation stance in opposition to an issue you feel
strongly enough to petition for, i found it amusingly ironic that you suggested
i was not a libertarian. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AP Photo/Scanpix Nordfoto, Palle Hedemann)
|
|
|
|
|
Text embedded within this jpeg:
Visitors look at goldfish swimming in blenders at the Trapholt Museum in Kolding, Denmark
Saturday, Feb. 12, 2000. The blender at right contains the remains of a goldfish that was
mashed Friday by a visitor who pushed the power-button. Visitors to the museum can turn on
the blenders each filled with water and a live goldfish and thereby decide whether the fish
should live or die. So far seven goldfish have been blended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
merwins response
what is on display?
|
|
000218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If one perspective of art is that it reflects humanity, then this is one of
the truest reflections I've ever heard of. The art isn't in the experience
of the goldfish, or the fragility of life. It's to watch who pushes the
button--the audience is the real art under scrutiny.
What is the state of humanity? How many of us respect life?
Or don't we want to know?
M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dont like it here? |
|
tell me why |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this page copyright © 2000 m. g. gadzikowski
portions reprinted from cnn.com
all rights reserved worldwide
|
|
 |
|